Paper detail

Doping a topological quantum spin liquid: slow holes in the Kitaev honeycomb model

We present a controlled microscopic study of mobile holes in the spatially anisotropic (Abelian) gapped phase of the Kitaev honeycomb model. We address the properties of (i) a single hole [its internal degrees of freedom as well as its hopping properties]; (ii) a pair of holes [their (relative) particle statistics and interactions]; (iii) the collective state for a finite density of holes. We find that each hole in the doped model has an eight-dimensional internal space, characterized by three internal quantum numbers: the first two "fractional" quantum numbers describe the binding to the hole of the fractional excitations (fluxes and fermions) of the undoped model, while the third "spin" quantum number determines the local magnetization around the hole. The fractional quantum numbers also encode fundamentally distinct particle properties, topologically robust against small local perturbations: some holes are free to hop in two dimensions, while others are confined to hop in one dimension only; distinct hole types have different particle statistics, and in particular, some of them exhibit non-trivial (anyonic) relative statistics. These particle properties in turn determine the physical properties of the multi-hole ground state at finite doping, and we identify two distinct ground states with different hole types that are stable for different model parameters. The respective hopping dimensionalities manifest themselves in an electrical conductivity approximately isotropic in one ground state and extremely anisotropic in the other one. We also compare our microscopic study with related mean-field treatments, and discuss the main discrepancies between the two approaches, which in particular involve the possibility of binding fractional excitations as well as the particle statistics of the holes.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.