Paper detail

Does Young's equation hold on the nanoscale? A Monte Carlo test for the binary Lennard-Jones fluid

When a phase-separated binary ($A+B$) mixture is exposed to a wall, that preferentially attracts one of the components, interfaces between A-rich and B-rich domains in general meet the wall making a contact angle $θ$. Young's equation describes this angle in terms of a balance between the $A-B$ interfacial tension $γ_{AB}$ and the surface tensions $γ_{wA}$, $γ_{wB}$ between, respectively, the $A$- and $B$-rich phases and the wall, $γ_{AB} \cos θ=γ_{wA}-γ_{wB}$. By Monte Carlo simulations of bridges, formed by one of the components in a binary Lennard-Jones liquid, connecting the two walls of a nanoscopic slit pore, $θ$ is estimated from the inclination of the interfaces, as a function of the wall-fluid interaction strength. The information on the surface tensions $γ_{wA}$, $γ_{wB}$ are obtained independently from a new thermodynamic integration method, while $γ_{AB}$ is found from the finite-size scaling analysis of the concentration distribution function. We show that Young's equation describes the contact angles of the actual nanoscale interfaces for this model rather accurately and location of the (first order) wetting transition is estimated.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.