Paper detail

Does the second critical-point of water really exist in nature?

In the past decade, a literary phrase "No man's land" has been flooded in the scientific papers. The expression is used to describe a meta-stable region in the phase-diagram that cannot be accessed by experiments. It has been claimed based on the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation that there is a critical point, or the second critical point (SCP), in the "no man's land," and it has created a big dispute in the field of science. It is proved in the present paper that the hypothesis of SCP is completely against the rigorous theorem of thermodynamics, referred as the Gibbs phase rule. The reason why the simulations have found SCP erroneously is merely because the method violates the requirement which all the statistical-mechanics treatments should satisfy to reproduce the thermodynamics. That is the thermodynamic limit. It is clarified what is the identity of the "liquid-liquid phase transition" and SCP in pure liquids, discovered by the simulations and by some experiments. In order to explain the physics of liquid-liquid phase transition observed experimentally in single component liquids, a new concept is proposed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.