Paper detail

Does the Feigel effect break the first law?

A recent theory posits that the quantum vacuum can transfer momentum to magnetoelectric media (the Feigel effect). Several related theories of vacuum momentum transfer to media have since been proposed. Neither these, nor the original theory have been observed experimentally, the existence a Feigel effect remaining highly contentious. Some investigations predict a measurable effect; others conclude vacuum momentum transfer to magnetoelectric media is not physically possible. Most analyses, including the original Fiegel theory, do not model experimentally realistic geometries and boundary conditions. I recently provided an alternative derivation of Feigel theory applied to realistic geometries, proposing experimental tests. I show here that in such geometries the existence of a steady Feigel effect (time-independent magnetoelectric susceptibilities) is equivalent to a violation of the first law of thermodynamics. A steady Feigel effect should not exist, as confirmed by a semi-classical quantum electrodynamic analysis. However, unsteady Feigel effects compatible with QED and thermodynamics are possible, and two such new effects are proposed.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.