Paper detail

Do Sweeping Effects Suppress Particle Dispersion in Synthetic Turbulence?

Synthetic models of Eulerian turbulence like so called "Kinematic Simulations" (KS) have been criticized by Thomson & Devenish (TD) (2005), who argued that sweeping decorrelation effects suppress pair dispersion in such models. We derive analytical results for Eulerian turbulence modeled by Gaussian random fields for the case with zero mean velocity. Our starting point is an exact integrodifferential equation for the particle pair separation distribution. When memory times of particle locations are short, a Markovian approximation leads to a Richardson-type diffusion model. We obtain a diffusivity tensor of the form $K_{ij}(r,t)=S_{ij}(r)τ(r,t)$ where $S_{ij}(r)$ is the structure-function tensor and $τ(r,t)$ is an effective correlation time of velocity increments. This is found to be the minimum value of three times: the intrinsic turnover time $τ_{eddy}(r)$ at separation $r$, the overall evolution time $t,$ and the sweeping time $r/v_0$ with $v_0$ the rms velocity. We study the diffusion model numerically by a Monte Carlo method. With moderate inertial-ranges like those achieved in current KS, our model is found to reproduce the $t^{9/2}$ power-law for pair dispersion predicted by TD and observed in the KS. However, for much longer ranges, our model exhibits three distinct pair-dispersion laws in the inertial-range: a Batchelor $t^2$-regime, followed by a $t^1$ diffusive regime, and then a $t^6$ regime. Finally, outside the inertial-range, there is another $t^1$ regime with particles undergoing independent Taylor diffusion. These scalings are exactly the same as those predicted by TD for KS with large mean velocities, which we argue hold also for KS with zero mean velocity. Our results support the basic conclusion that sweeping effects make Lagrangian properties of KS fundamentally different from hydrodynamic turbulence for very extended inertial-ranges.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.