Paper detail

Do extreme events trigger turbulence decay? - a numerical study of turbulence decay time in pipe flows

Turbulence locally created in laminar pipe flows shows sudden decay or splitting after a stochastic waiting time. In laboratory experiments, the mean waiting time was observed to increase double-exponentially as the Reynolds number (Re) approaches its critical value. To understand the origin of this double-exponential increase, we perform many pipe flow direct numerical simulations of the Navier-Stokes equations, and measure the cumulative histogram of the maximum axial vorticity field over the pipe (turbulence intensity). In the domain where the turbulence intensity is not small, we observe that the histogram is well-approximated by the Gumbel extreme-value distribution. The smallest turbulence intensity in this domain roughly corresponds to the transition value between the locally stable turbulence and a meta-stable (edge) state. Studying the Re dependence of the fitting parameters in this distribution, we derive that the time scale of the transition between these two states increases double-exponentially as Re approaches its critical value. On the contrary, in smaller turbulence intensities below this domain, we observe that the distribution is not sensible to the change of Re. This means that the decay time of the meta-stable state (to the laminar state) is stochastic but Re-independent in average. Our observation suggests that the conjecture made by Goldenfeld et al. to derive the double-exponential increase of turbulence decay time is approximately satisfied in the range of Re we studied. We also discuss using another extreme-value distribution, Fréchet distribution, instead of the Gumbel distribution to approximate the histogram of the turbulence intensify, which reveals interesting perspectives.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.