Paper detail

DNNAbacus: Toward Accurate Computational Cost Prediction for Deep Neural Networks

Deep learning is attracting interest across a variety of domains, including natural language processing, speech recognition, and computer vision. However, model training is time-consuming and requires huge computational resources. Existing works on the performance prediction of deep neural networks, which mostly focus on the training time prediction of a few models, rely on analytical models and result in high relative errors. %Optimizing task scheduling and reducing job failures in data centers are essential to improve resource utilization and reduce carbon emissions. This paper investigates the computational resource demands of 29 classical deep neural networks and builds accurate models for predicting computational costs. We first analyze the profiling results of typical networks and demonstrate that the computational resource demands of models with different inputs and hyperparameters are not obvious and intuitive. We then propose a lightweight prediction approach DNNAbacus with a novel network structural matrix for network representation. DNNAbacus can accurately predict both memory and time cost for PyTorch and TensorFlow models, which is also generalized to different hardware architectures and can have zero-shot capability for unseen networks. Our experimental results show that the mean relative error (MRE) is 0.9% with respect to time and 2.8% with respect to memory for 29 classic models, which is much lower than the state-of-the-art works.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.