Abstract

We present deterministic distributed algorithms for computing approximate maximum cardinality matchings and approximate maximum weight matchings. Our algorithm for the unweighted case computes a matching whose size is at least $(1-\eps)$ times the optimal in $Δ^{O(1/\eps)} + O\left(\frac{1}{\eps^2}\right) \cdot\log^*(n)$ rounds where nn is the number of vertices in the graph and ΔΔ is the maximum degree. Our algorithm for the edge-weighted case computes a matching whose weight is at least $(1-\eps)$ times the optimal in $\log(\min\{1/\wmin,n/\eps\})^{O(1/\eps)}\cdot(Δ^{O(1/\eps)}+\log^*(n))$ rounds for edge-weights in $[\wmin,1]$. The best previous algorithms for both the unweighted case and the weighted case are by Lotker, Patt-Shamir, and Pettie~(SPAA 2008). For the unweighted case they give a randomized $(1-\eps)$-approximation algorithm that runs in $O((\log(n)) /\eps^3)$ rounds. For the weighted case they give a randomized $(1/2-\eps)$-approximation algorithm that runs in $O(\log(\eps^{-1}) \cdot \log(n))$ rounds. Hence, our results improve on the previous ones when the parameters ΔΔ, $\eps$ and $\wmin$ are constants (where we reduce the number of runs from O(log⁡(n))O(\log(n)) to O(log⁡∗(n))O(\log^*(n))), and more generally when ΔΔ, $1/\eps$ and $1/\wmin$ are sufficiently slowly increasing functions of nn. Moreover, our algorithms are deterministic rather than randomized.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.