Paper detail

Distributed Dense Subgraph Detection and Low Outdegree Orientation

The densest subgraph problem, introduced in the 80s by Picard and Queyranne as well as Goldberg, is a classic problem in combinatorial optimization with a wide range of applications. The lowest outdegree orientation problem is known to be its dual problem. We study both the problem of finding dense subgraphs and the problem of computing a low outdegree orientation in the distributed settings. Suppose $G=(V,E)$ is the underlying network as well as the input graph. Let $D$ denote the density of the maximum density subgraph of $G$. Our main results are as follows. Given a value $\tilde{D} \leq D$ and $0 < ε< 1$, we show that a subgraph with density at least $(1-ε)\tilde{D}$ can be identified deterministically in $O((\log n) / ε)$ rounds in the LOCAL model. We also present a lower bound showing that our result for the LOCAL model is tight up to an $O(\log n)$ factor. In the CONGEST model, we show that such a subgraph can be identified in $O((\log^3 n) / ε^3)$ rounds with high probability. Our techniques also lead to an $O(diameter + (\log^4 n)/ε^4)$-round algorithm that yields a $1-ε$ approximation to the densest subgraph. This improves upon the previous $O(diameter /ε\cdot \log n)$-round algorithm by Das Sarma et al. [DISC 2012] that only yields a $1/2-ε$ approximation. Given an integer $\tilde{D} \geq D$ and $Ω(1/\tilde{D}) < ε< 1/4$, we give a deterministic, $\tilde{O}((\log^2 n) /ε^2)$-round algorithm in the CONGEST model that computes an orientation where the outdegree of every vertex is upper bounded by $(1+ε)\tilde{D}$. Previously, the best deterministic algorithm and randomized algorithm by Harris [FOCS 2019] run in $\tilde{O}((\log^6 n)/ ε^4)$ rounds and $\tilde{O}((\log^3 n) /ε^3)$ rounds respectively and only work in the LOCAL model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.