Paper detail

Distributed Alignment Processes with Samples of Group Average

Reaching agreement despite noise in communication is a fundamental problem in multi-agent systems. Here we study this problem under an idealized model, where it is assumed that agents can sense the general tendency in the system. More specifically, we consider $n$ agents, each being associated with a real-valued number. In each round, each agent receives a noisy measurement of the average value, and then updates its value, which is in turn perturbed by random drift. We assume that both noises in measurements and drift follow Gaussian distributions. What should be the updating policy of agents if their goal is to minimize the expected deviation of the agents' values from the average value? We prove that a distributed weighted-average algorithm optimally minimizes this deviation for each agent, and for any round. Interestingly, this optimality holds even in the centralized setting, where a master agent can gather all the agents' measurements and instruct a move to each agent.We find this result surprising since it can be shown that the total measurements obtained by all agents contain strictly more information about the deviation of Agent $i$ from the average value, than the information contained in the measurements obtained by Agent $i$ alone. Although this information is relevant for Agent $i$, it is not processed by it when running a weighted-average algorithm. Nevertheless, the weighted-average algorithm is optimal, since by running it, other agents manage to fully process this information in a way that perfectly benefits Agent $i$.Finally, we also analyze the drift of the center of mass and show that no distributed algorithm can achieve drift that is as small as the one that can be achieved by the best centralized algorithm. In light of this, we also show that the drift associated with our weighted-average algorithm incurs a relatively small overhead over the best possible drift in the centralized setting.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.