Paper detail

Disorder, Low-Energy Excitations, and Topology in the Kitaev Spin Liquid

The Kitaev model is a fascinating example of an exactly solvable model displaying a spin-liquid ground state in two dimensions. However, deviations from the original Kitaev model are expected to appear in real materials. In this Letter, we investigate the fate of Kitaev's spin liquid in the presence of disorder -- bond defects or vacancies -- for an extended version of the model. Considering static flux backgrounds, we observe a power-law divergence in the low-energy limit of the density of states with a nonuniversal exponent. We link this power-law distribution of energy scales to weakly coupled droplets inside the bulk, in an uncanny similarity to the Griffiths phase often present in the vicinity of disordered quantum phase transitions. If time-reversal symmetry is broken, we find that power-law singularities are tied to the destruction of the topological phase of the Kitaev model in the presence of bond disorder alone. However, there is a transition from this topologically trivial phase with power-law singularities to a topologically nontrivial one for weak to moderate site dilution. Therefore, diluted Kitaev materials are potential candidates to host Kitaev's chiral spin-liquid phase.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.