Paper detail

Disk Models for MCG-06-30-15: The Variability Challenge

Recent observations have shown that the Fe Kalpha line profile of the Seyfert~1 galaxy MCG-06-30-15 is strongly variable. We attempt accretion disk model fits to the Fa Kalpha line profiles in a high, low and medium continuum luminosity phase of this source. During the monitoring by Iwasawa et al. (1996) a broad red-shifted component remained reasonably constant while a narrower component at $\approx$ 6.4 keV strongly responded to continuum changes. Physically consistent fits are possible if the index xi of the power-law emissivity changes from 0.7 (high phase) to 3.0 (low phase). The shape of the red-shifted component at low phase is crucial to the disk model interpretation. We suggest that the actual shape may be a broad redshifted Gaussian. Three lines of evidence support the interpretation of the Fe Kalpha line as multicomponent, beyond the lack of correlation in the response to continuum changes of the red and blue components in MCG -06-30-15. (1) We show that the strong concentration of narrow peak centroids at 6.4 keV is inconsistent with expectations of a random distribution of disk orientations. (2) The average Fe Kalpha profile for a sample of 16 mostly Seyfert~1's suggests a natural decomposition into two Gaussians one unshifted/narrow and the other redshifted/broad. (3) Evidence for emission in excess to the expectation of disk models on the high energy side of the Fe Kalpha profile is both a challenge for low inclination disk models and support for the two component decomposition.

preprint1998arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.