Paper detail

Discriminating between and within (semi)continuous classes of both Tweedie and geometric Tweedie models

In both Tweedie and geometric Tweedie models, the common power parameter $p\notin(0,1)$ works as an automatic distribution selection. It mainly separates two subclasses of semicontinuous ($1<p<2$) and positive continuous ($p\geq 2$) distributions. Our paper centers around exploring diagnostic tools based on the maximum likelihood ratio test and minimum Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance methods in order to discriminate very close distributions within each subclass of these two models according to values of $p$. Grounded on the unique equality of variation indices, we also discriminate the gamma and geometric gamma distributions with $p=2$ in Tweedie and geometric Tweedie families, respectively. Probabilities of correct selection for several combinations of dispersion parameters, means and sample sizes are examined by simulations. We thus perform a numerical comparison study to assess the discrimination procedures in these subclasses of two families. Finally, semicontinuous ($1<p\leq 2$) distributions in the broad sense are significantly more distinguishable than the over-varied continuous ($p>2$) ones; and two datasets for illustration purposes are investigated.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.