Paper detail

Discretization of 4d Poincaré BF theory: from groups to 2-groups

We study the discretization of a Poincaré/Euclidean BF theory. Upon the addition of a boundary term, this theory is equivalent to the BFCG theory defined in terms of the Poincaré/Euclidean 2-group. At an intermediate step in the discretization, we note that there are multiple options for how to proceed. One option brings us back to recovering the discrete variables and phase space of BF theory. Another option allows us to rediscover the phase space related to the G-networks given in [2]. Indeed, our main result is that we are now able to relate the continuum fields with the discrete variables in [2]. This relation is important to determine how to implement the simplicity constraints to recover gravity using the BFCG action. In fact, we show that such relation is not as simple as in the BF discretization: the discretized variables on the triangles actually depend on several of the continuum fields instead of solely the continuum B-field. We also compare and contrast the discretized BF and BFCG models as pairs of dual 2-groups. This work highlights (again) how the choice of boundary term influences the resulting symmetry structure of the \textit{discretized theory} -- and hence ultimately the choice of quantum states.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.