Researcher profile

Panagiotis Tsimiklis

Panagiotis Tsimiklis contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Group field theory on 2-groups

Group field theories are quantum field theories built on groups. They can be seen as a tool to generate topological state-sums or quantum gravity models. For four dimensional manifolds, different arguments have pointed towards 2-groups (such as crossed modules) as the relevant symmetry structure to probe four dimensional topological features. Here, we introduce a group field theory built on crossed modules which generate a four dimensional topological model, as we prove that the Feynman diagram amplitudes can be related by Pachner moves. This model is presumably the dual version of the Yetter-Mackaay model.

preprint2021arXiv

Discretization of 4d Poincaré BF theory: from groups to 2-groups

We study the discretization of a Poincaré/Euclidean BF theory. Upon the addition of a boundary term, this theory is equivalent to the BFCG theory defined in terms of the Poincaré/Euclidean 2-group. At an intermediate step in the discretization, we note that there are multiple options for how to proceed. One option brings us back to recovering the discrete variables and phase space of BF theory. Another option allows us to rediscover the phase space related to the G-networks given in [2]. Indeed, our main result is that we are now able to relate the continuum fields with the discrete variables in [2]. This relation is important to determine how to implement the simplicity constraints to recover gravity using the BFCG action. In fact, we show that such relation is not as simple as in the BF discretization: the discretized variables on the triangles actually depend on several of the continuum fields instead of solely the continuum B-field. We also compare and contrast the discretized BF and BFCG models as pairs of dual 2-groups. This work highlights (again) how the choice of boundary term influences the resulting symmetry structure of the \textit{discretized theory} -- and hence ultimately the choice of quantum states.