Paper detail

Discrete-Time Mean Field Type Games: Probabilistic Setup

We introduce a general probabilistic framework for discrete-time, infinite-horizon discounted Mean Field Type Games (MFTGs) with both global common noise and team-specific common noises. In our model, agents are allowed to use randomized actions, both at the individual level and at the team level. We formalize the concept of Mean Field Markov Games (MFMGs) and establish a connection between closed-loop policies in MFTGs and Markov policies in MFMGs through different layers of randomization. By leveraging recent results on infinite-horizon discounted games with infinite compact state-action spaces, we prove the existence of an optimal closed-loop policy for the original MFTG when the state spaces are at most countable and the action spaces are general Polish spaces. We also present an example satisfying our assumptions, called Mean Field Drift of Intentions, where the dynamics are strongly randomized, and we establish the existence of a Nash equilibrium using our theoretical results.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.