Paper detail

Discrete flavour symmetries for degenerate solar neutrino pair and their predictions

Flavour symmetries appropriate for describing a neutrino spectrum with degenerate solar pair and a third massive or massless neutrino are discussed. We demand that the required residual symmetries of the leptonic mass matrices be subgroups of some discrete symmetry group $G_f$. $G_f$ can be a subgroup of SU(3) if the third neutrino is massive and we derive general results on the mixing angle predictions for various discrete subgroups of SU(3). The main results are: (a) All the SU(3) subgroups of type C fail in simultaneously giving correct $θ_{13}$ and $θ_{23}$. (b) All the groups of type D can predict a relation $\cos^2θ_{13} \sin^2θ_{23}=\frac{1}{3}$ among the mixing angles which appears to be a good zeroth order approximation. Among these, various $Δ(6n^2)$ groups with $n\geq 8$ can simultaneously lead also to $\sin^2 θ_{13}$ in agreement with global fit at 3$σ$. (c) The group $Σ(168)\cong PSL(2,7)$ predicts near to the best fit value for $θ_{13}$ and $θ_{23}$ within the 1$σ$ range. All discrete subgroups of U(3) with order $<512$ and having three dimensional irreducible representation are considered as possible $G_f$ when the third neutrino is massless. Only seven of them are shown to be viable and three of these can correctly predict $θ_{13}$ and/or $θ_{23}$. The solar angle remains undetermined at the leading order in all the cases due to degeneracy in the masses. A class of general perturbations which can correctly reproduce all the observables are discussed in the context of several groups which offer good leading order predictions.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.