Paper detail

Discrepancy of stratified samples from partitions of the unit cube

We extend the notion of jittered sampling to arbitrary partitions and study the discrepancy of the related point sets. Let $\mathbfΩ=(Ω_1,\ldots,Ω_N)$ be a partition of $[0,1]^d$ and let the $i$th point in $\mathcal{P}$ be chosen uniformly in the $i$th set of the partition (and stochastically independent of the other points), $i=1,\ldots,N$. For the study of such sets we introduce the concept of a uniformly distributed triangular array and compare this notion to related notions in the literature. We prove that the expected ${\mathcal{L}_p}$-discrepancy, $\mathbb{E} {\mathcal{L}_p}(\mathcal{P}_{\mathbfΩ})^p$, of a point set $\mathcal{P}_\mathbfΩ$ generated from any equivolume partition $\mathbfΩ$ is always strictly smaller than the expected ${\mathcal{L}_p}$-discrepancy of a set of $N$ uniform random samples for $p>1$. For fixed $N$ we consider classes of stratified samples based on equivolume partitions of the unit cube into convex sets or into sets with a uniform positive lower bound on their reach. It is shown that these classes contain at least one minimizer of the expected ${\mathcal{L}_p}$-discrepancy. We illustrate our results with explicit constructions for small $N$. In addition, we present a family of partitions that seems to improve the expected discrepancy of Monte Carlo sampling by a factor of 2 for every $N$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.