Paper detail

Discrepancy estimates for variance bounding Markov chain quasi-Monte Carlo

Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations are modeled as driven by true random numbers. We consider variance bounding Markov chains driven by a deterministic sequence of numbers. The star-discrepancy provides a measure of efficiency of such Markov chain quasi-Monte Carlo methods. We define a pull-back discrepancy of the driver sequence and state a close relation to the star-discrepancy of the Markov chain-quasi Monte Carlo samples. We prove that there exists a deterministic driver sequence such that the discrepancies decrease almost with the Monte Carlo rate $n^{1/2}$. As for MCMC simulations, a burn-in period can also be taken into account for Markov chain quasi-Monte Carlo to reduce the influence of the initial state. In particular, our discrepancy bound leads to an estimate of the error for the computation of expectations. To illustrate our theory we provide an example for the Metropolis algorithm based on a ball walk. Furthermore, under additional assumptions we prove the existence of a driver sequence such that the discrepancy of the corresponding deterministic Markov chain sample decreases with order $n^{-1+δ}$ for every $δ>0$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.