Paper detail

Discovering topically- and temporally-coherent events in interaction networks

With the increasing use of online communication platforms, such as email, twitter, and messaging applications, we are faced with a growing amount of data that combine content (what is said), time (when), and user (by whom) information. An important computational challenge is to analyze these data, discover meaningful patterns, and understand what is happening. We consider the problem of mining online communication data and finding top-k temporal events. We define a temporal event to be a coherent topic that is discussed frequently, in a relatively short time span, while the information ow of the event respects the underlying network structure. We construct our model for detecting temporal events in two steps. We first introduce the notion of interaction meta-graph, which connects associated interactions. Using this notion, we define a temporal event to be a subset of interactions that (i) are topically and temporally close and (ii) correspond to a tree that captures the information ow. Finding the best temporal event leads to budget version of the prize-collecting Steiner-tree (PCST) problem, which we solve using three different methods: a greedy approach, a dynamic-programming algorithm, and an adaptation to an existing approximation algorithm. The problem of finding the top- k events among a set of candidate events maps to maximum set-cover problem, and thus, solved by greedy. We compare and analyze our algorithms in both synthetic and real datasets, such as twitter and email communication. The results show that our methods are able to detect meaningful temporal events.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.