Paper detail

Discovering techni-dilaton at LHC

We present discovery signatures of techni-dilaton (TD) at LHC. The TD was predicted long ago as a pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson (pNGB) associated with the spontaneous breaking of the approximate scale symmetry in the walking technicolor (WTC) (initially dubbed &#34;scale-invariant technicolor&#34;). Being pNGB, the TD should have a mass M_TD lighter than other techni-hadrons like techni-rho meson; It has recently been estimated to be M_TD ~= 500-600 GeV for the typical WTC model, which is well in the discovery range of the ongoing LHC experiment. Noting that all the TD couplings to the standard model (SM) particles arise only through loop of the techni-fermions with their induced Yukawa couplings to the composite TD, we find that the TD-WW and ZZ couplings get dramatically suppressed compared with those of the SM Higgs which has tree-level couplings proportional to their masses. In contrast, TD couplings to gg, t tbar and gamma gamma are not suppressed and hence are relatively enhanced compared to those of the SM Higgs. We explicitly evaluate the TD LHC production cross sections at sqrt(s)=7 TeV times the branching ratios in terms of the TD mass M_TD as an input parameter for the region 200 GeV < M_TD < 1000 GeV in the typical WTC models. Remarkably, the WW/ZZ mode is shown to be consistent with the recent ATLAS and CMS bounds for M_TD > 350(400) GeV in the one-doublet (one-family) model, thanks to the suppressed WW/ZZ coupling in sharp contrast to the SM Higgs. On the other hand, the gg, gamma gamma and t tbar modes are not suppressed compared to the SM Higgs: Particularly in the one-family model with M_TD ~= 500-600 GeV, the cross section times the TD -> gamma gamma branching ratio gets gigantically enhanced to be ~ 10^(-3)-10^(-2) pb, which is large enough to be discovered within the first-year&#39;s run at LHC and hence a smoking-gun of the TD.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.