Paper detail

Direction Dependence in Supernova Data: Constraining Isotropy

We revise and extend the extreme value statistic, introduced in \cite{gup08}, to study directional dependence in the high redshift supernova data; arising either from departures from the cosmological principle or due to direction dependent statistical systematics in e data. We introduce a likelihood function that analytically marginalises over the Hubble constant, and use it to extend our previous statistic. We also introduce a new statistic that is sensitive to direction dependence arising from living off-centre inside a large void, as well as previously mentioned reasons for anisotropy. We show that for large data sets this statistic has a limiting form that can be computed analytically. We apply our statistics to the gold data sets from \cite{rie04} and \cite{rie07}, as in our previous work. Our revision and extension of previous statistic shows that 1) the effect of marginalsing over Hubble constant instead of using its best fit value has only a marginal effect on our results. However, correction of errors in our previous work reduce the level of non-Gaussianity in the 2004 gold data that was found in our earlier work. The revised results for the 2007 gold data show that the data is consistent with isotropy and Gaussianity. Our second statistic confirms these results.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.