Source author record

Shashikant Gupta

Shashikant Gupta appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

astro-ph.CO astro-ph astro-ph.IM physics.data-an

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

Measurement of Hubble Constant: Do Different Cosmological Probes Provide Different Values?

Different measurements of the Hubble constant ($H_{0}$) are not consistent and a tension between the CMB based methods and cosmic distance ladder based methods has been observed. Measurements from various distance based methods are also inconsistent. To aggravate the problem, same cosmological probe (Type Ia SNe for instance) calibrated through different methods also provide different value of $H_{0}$. We compare various distance ladder based methods through the already available unique data obtained from Hubble Space Telescope (HST). Our analysis is based on parametric (T-test) as well as non-parametric statistical methods such as the Mann-Whitney U test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Our results show that different methods provide different values of $H_0$ and the differences are statistically significant. The biases in the calibration would not account for these differences as the data has been taken from a single telescope with common calibration scheme. The unknown physical effects or issues with the empirical relations of distance measurement from different probes could give rise to these differences.

preprint2016arXiv

Measurement of Hubble constant: Non-Gaussian Errors in HST key project data

Assuming the Central Limit Theorem, experimental uncertainties in any data set are expected to follow the Gaussian distribution with zero mean. We propose an elegant method based on Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic to test the above; and apply it on the measurement of Hubble constant which determines the expansion rate of the Universe. The measurements were made using Hubble Space Telescope. Our analysis shows that the uncertainties in the above measurement are non-Gaussian.

preprint2011arXiv

Non-Gaussianity and direction dependent systematics in HST key project data

Two new statistics, namely $Δ_χ^2$ and $Δ_χ$, based on extreme value theory, were derived in \cite{gupta08,gupta10}. We use these statistics to study direction dependence in the HST key project data which provides the most precise measurement of the Hubble constant. We also study the non-Gaussianity in this data set using these statistics. Our results for $Δ_χ^2$ show that the significance of direction dependent systematics is restricted to well below one $σ$ confidence limit, however, presence of non-Gaussian features is subtle. On the other hand $Δ_χ$ statistic, which is more sensitive to direction dependence, shows direction dependence systematics to be at slightly higher confidence level, and the presence of non-Gaussian features at a level similar to the $Δ_χ^2$ statistic.

preprint2010arXiv

Direction Dependence in Supernova Data: Constraining Isotropy

We revise and extend the extreme value statistic, introduced in \cite{gup08}, to study directional dependence in the high redshift supernova data; arising either from departures from the cosmological principle or due to direction dependent statistical systematics in e data. We introduce a likelihood function that analytically marginalises over the Hubble constant, and use it to extend our previous statistic. We also introduce a new statistic that is sensitive to direction dependence arising from living off-centre inside a large void, as well as previously mentioned reasons for anisotropy. We show that for large data sets this statistic has a limiting form that can be computed analytically. We apply our statistics to the gold data sets from \cite{rie04} and \cite{rie07}, as in our previous work. Our revision and extension of previous statistic shows that 1) the effect of marginalsing over Hubble constant instead of using its best fit value has only a marginal effect on our results. However, correction of errors in our previous work reduce the level of non-Gaussianity in the 2004 gold data that was found in our earlier work. The revised results for the 2007 gold data show that the data is consistent with isotropy and Gaussianity. Our second statistic confirms these results.

preprint2007arXiv

Direction Dependent Non-gaussianity in High-z Supernova Data

The most detailed constraints on the accelerating expansion of the universe and details of nature of dark energy are derived from the high redshift supernova data, assuming that the errors in the measurements are Gaussian in nature. There is a possibility that there are direction dependent systematics in the data, either due to uncorrected, known physical processes or because there are tiny departures from the cosmological principle, making the universe slightly anisotropic. To investigate this possibility we introduce a statistic based on the extreme value theory and apply it to the gold data set from Riess et al. (2004). Our analysis indicates a systematic, direction dependent non-gaussianity at about one sigma level.