Paper detail

Direct CP violation in $K\to ππ$ decays and supersymmetry

The quantities $ε_K^\prime$ and $ε_K$ measure the amount of direct and indirect CP violation in $K\to ππ$ decays, respectively. Using the recent lattice results from the RBC and UKQCD Collaborations and a new compact implementation of the $ΔS=1$ renormalization group evolution we predict $ \mbox{Re}\, \frac{ε_{K}'}{ε_{K}} = \left(1.06 \pm 5.07 \right) \times 10^{-4}$ in the Standard Model. This value is $2.8\,σ$ below the experimental value of $ \mbox{Re}\, \frac{ε_{K}'}{ε_{K}} = \left(16.6 \pm 2.3 \right) \times 10^{-4}.$ In generic models of new physics the well-understood $ε_K$ precludes large contributions to $ε_K^\prime$, if the new contributions enter at loop level. However, one can resolve the tension in $ε_{K}'/ε_{K}$ within the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model. To this end two features of supersymmetry are crucial: First, one can have large isospin-breaking contributions (involving the strong instead of the weak interaction) which enhance $ε_K^\prime$. Second, the Majorana nature of gluinos permits a suppression of the MSSM contribution to $ε_K$, because two box diagrams interfere destructively.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.