Paper detail

Direct CP Violation in Charmless Three-body Decays of $B$ Mesons

Direct CP violation in charmless three-body hadronic decays of $B$ mesons is studied within the framework of a simple model based on the factorization approach. Three-body decays of heavy mesons receive both resonant and nonresonant contributions. Dominant nonresonant contributions to tree-dominated and penguin-dominated three-body decays arise from the $b\to u$ tree transition and $b\to s$ penguin transition, respectively. The former can be evaluated in the framework of heavy meson chiral perturbation theory with some modification, while the latter is governed by the matrix element of the scalar density $\langle M_1M_2|\bar q_1 q_2|0\rangle$. Strong phases in this work reside in effective Wilson coefficients, propagators of resonances and the matrix element of scalar density. In order to accommodate the branching fraction and CP asymmetries observed in $B^-\to K^-π^+π^-$, the matrix element $\langle Kπ|\bar sq|0\rangle$ should have an additional strong phase, which might arise from some sort of power corrections such as final-state interactions. We calculate inclusive and regional CP asymmetries and find that nonresonant CP violation is usually much larger than the resonant one and that the interference effect is generally quite significant. If nonresonant contributions are turned off in the $K^+K^-K^-$ mode, the predicted CP asymmetries due to resonances will be wrong in sign when confronted with experiment. In our study of $B^-\to π^-π^+π^-$, we find that ${\cal A}_{C\!P}(ρ^0π^-)$ should be positive in order to account for CP asymmetries observed in this decay. However, all theories predict a large and negative CP violation in $B^-\to ρ^0π^-$. Measurements of CP-asymmetry Dalitz distributions put very stringent constraints on the theoretical models. We check the magnitude and the sign of violation in some (large) invariant mass regions to test our model.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.