Paper detail

Direct CP violation in $Λ_b$ decays

We study direct CP violating asymmetries (CPAs) in the two-body $Λ_b$ decays of $Λ_b\to pM(V)$ with $M(V)=K^-(K^{*-})$ and $π^-(ρ^-)$ based on the generalized factorization method. After simultaneously explaining the observed decay branching ratios of $Λ_b\to (p K^-\,,\; p π^-)$ with ${\cal R}_{πK}\equiv {\cal B}(Λ_b\to p π^-)/{\cal B}(Λ_b\to p K^-)$ being $0.84\pm 0.09$, we find that their corresponding direct CPAs are $(5.8\pm 0.2,\,-3.9\pm 0.2)\%$ in the standard model (SM), in comparison with $(-5^{+26}_{-~5},\, -31^{+43}_{-~1})\%$ and $(-10\pm8\pm4,\, 6\pm7\pm3)\%$ from the perturbative QCD calculation and the CDF experiment, respectively. For $Λ_b\to ( p K^{*-},\, pρ^-)$, the decay branching ratios and CPVs in the SM are predicted to be $(2.5\pm0.5,\,11.4\pm2.1)\times 10^{-6}$ with ${\cal R}_{ρK^*}=4.6\pm0.5$ and $(19.6\pm1.6,\, -3.7\pm0.3)\%$, respectively. The uncertainties for the CPAs in these decay modes as well as ${\cal R}_{πK,\,ρK^{*-}}$ mainly arise from the quark mixing elements and non-factorizable effects, whereas those from the hadronic matrix elements are either totally eliminated or small. We point out that the large CPA for $Λ_b\to p K^{*-}$ is promising to be measured by the CDF and LHCb experiments, which is a clean test of the SM.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.