Paper detail

Diminishing Empirical Risk Minimization for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection

Unsupervised anomaly detection (AD) is a challenging task in realistic applications. Recently, there is an increasing trend to detect anomalies with deep neural networks (DNN). However, most popular deep AD detectors cannot protect the network from learning contaminated information brought by anomalous data, resulting in unsatisfactory detection performance and overfitting issues. In this work, we identify one reason that hinders most existing DNN-based anomaly detection methods from performing is the wide adoption of the Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM). ERM assumes that the performance of an algorithm on an unknown distribution can be approximated by averaging losses on the known training set. This averaging scheme thus ignores the distinctions between normal and anomalous instances. To break through the limitations of ERM, we propose a novel Diminishing Empirical Risk Minimization (DERM) framework. Specifically, DERM adaptively adjusts the impact of individual losses through a well-devised aggregation strategy. Theoretically, our proposed DERM can directly modify the gradient contribution of each individual loss in the optimization process to suppress the influence of outliers, leading to a robust anomaly detector. Empirically, DERM outperformed the state-of-the-art on the unsupervised AD benchmark consisting of 18 datasets.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.