Paper detail

Dimensionality Reduction for Sentiment Classification: Evolving for the Most Prominent and Separable Features

In sentiment classification, the enormous amount of textual data, its immense dimensionality, and inherent noise make it extremely difficult for machine learning classifiers to extract high-level and complex abstractions. In order to make the data less sparse and more statistically significant, the dimensionality reduction techniques are needed. But in the existing dimensionality reduction techniques, the number of components needs to be set manually which results in loss of the most prominent features, thus reducing the performance of the classifiers. Our prior work, i.e., Term Presence Count (TPC) and Term Presence Ratio (TPR) have proven to be effective techniques as they reject the less separable features. However, the most prominent and separable features might still get removed from the initial feature set despite having higher distributions among positive and negative tagged documents. To overcome this problem, we have proposed a new framework that consists of two-dimensionality reduction techniques i.e., Sentiment Term Presence Count (SentiTPC) and Sentiment Term Presence Ratio (SentiTPR). These techniques reject the features by considering term presence difference for SentiTPC and ratio of the distribution distinction for SentiTPR. Additionally, these methods also analyze the total distribution information. Extensive experimental results exhibit that the proposed framework reduces the feature dimension by a large scale, and thus significantly improve the classification performance.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.