Paper detail

Digital pathology-based study of cell- and tissue-level morphologic features in serous borderline ovarian tumor and high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Serous borderline ovarian tumor (SBOT) and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) are two distinct subtypes of epithelial ovarian tumors, with markedly different biologic background, behavior, prognosis, and treatment. However, the histologic diagnosis of serous ovarian tumors can be subjectively variable and labor-intensive as multiple tumor slides/blocks need to be thoroughly examined to search for these features. In this study, we aimed to evaluate technical feasibility of using digital pathological approaches to facilitate objective and scalable diagnosis screening for SBOT and HGSOC. Based on Groovy scripts and QuPath, a novel informatics system was developed to facilitate interactive annotation and imaging data exchange for machine learning purposes. Through this developed system, cellular boundaries were detected and expanded set of cellular features were extracted to represent cell- and tissue-level characteristics. According to our evaluation, cell-level classification was accurately achieved for both tumor and stroma cells with greater than 90% accuracy. Upon further re-examinations, 44.2% of the misclassified cells were due to over-/under-segmentations or low-quality of imaging areas. For a total number of 6,485 imaging patches with sufficient tumor and stroma cells (ten of each at least), we achieved 91-95% accuracy to differentiate HGSOC v. SBOT. When all the patches were considered for a WSI to make consensus prediction, 97% accuracy was achieved for accurately classifying all patients, indicating that cellular features digitally extracted from pathological images can be used for cell classification and SBOT v. HGSOC differentiation. Introducing digital pathology into ovarian cancer research could be beneficial to discover potential clinical implications.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.