Paper detail

Diffusive estimates for random walks on stationary random graphs of polynomial growth

Let $(G,ρ)$ be a stationary random graph, and use $B^G_ρ(r)$ to denote the ball of radius $r$ about $ρ$ in $G$. Suppose that $(G,ρ)$ has annealed polynomial growth, in the sense that $\mathbb{E}[|B^G_ρ(r)|] \leq O(r^k)$ for some $k > 0$ and every $r \geq 1$. Then there is an infinite sequence of times $\{t_n\}$ at which the random walk $\{X_t\}$ on $(G,ρ)$ is at most diffusive: Almost surely (over the choice of $(G,ρ)$), there is a number $C > 0$ such that \[ \mathbb{E} \left[\mathrm{dist}_G(X_0, X_{t_n})^2 \mid X_0 = ρ, (G,ρ)\right]\leq C t_n\qquad \forall n \geq 1\,. \] This result is new even in the case when $G$ is a stationary random subgraph of $\mathbb{Z}^d$. Combined with the work of Benjamini, Duminil-Copin, Kozma, and Yadin (2015), it implies that $G$ almost surely does not admit a non-constant harmonic function of sublinear growth. To complement this, we argue that passing to a subsequence of times $\{t_n\}$ is necessary, as there are stationary random graphs of (almost sure) polynomial growth where the random walk is almost surely superdiffusive at an infinite subset of times.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.