Paper detail

Diffusion as a possible mechanism controlling the production of superheavy nuclei in cold fusion reactions

The fusion probability for the production of superheavy nuclei in cold fusion reactions was investigated and compared with recent experimental results for $^{48}$Ca, $^{50}$Ti, and $^{54}$Cr incident on a $^{208}$Pb target. Calculations were performed within the fusion-by-diffusion model (FbD) using new nuclear data tables by Jachimowicz et al. It is shown that the experimental data could be well explained within the framework of the FbD model. The saturation of the fusion probability at bombarding energies above the interaction barrier is reproduced. It emerges naturally from the physical effect of the suppression of contributions of higher partial waves in fusion reactions and is related to the critical angular momentum. The role of the difference in values of the rotational energies in the fusion saddle point and contact (sticking) configuration of the projectile-target system is discussed.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.