Paper detail

Differentially Private SGD with Non-Smooth Losses

In this paper, we are concerned with differentially private {stochastic gradient descent (SGD)} algorithms in the setting of stochastic convex optimization (SCO). Most of the existing work requires the loss to be Lipschitz continuous and strongly smooth, and the model parameter to be uniformly bounded. However, these assumptions are restrictive as many popular losses violate these conditions including the hinge loss for SVM, the absolute loss in robust regression, and even the least square loss in an unbounded domain. We significantly relax these restrictive assumptions and establish privacy and generalization (utility) guarantees for private SGD algorithms using output and gradient perturbations associated with non-smooth convex losses. Specifically, the loss function is relaxed to have an $α$-Hölder continuous gradient (referred to as $α$-Hölder smoothness) which instantiates the Lipschitz continuity ($α=0$) and the strong smoothness ($α=1$). We prove that noisy SGD with $α$-Hölder smooth losses using gradient perturbation can guarantee $(ε,δ)$-differential privacy (DP) and attain optimal excess population risk $\mathcal{O}\Big(\frac{\sqrt{d\log(1/δ)}}{nε}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\Big)$, up to logarithmic terms, with the gradient complexity $ \mathcal{O}( n^{2-α\over 1+α}+ n).$ This shows an important trade-off between $α$-Hölder smoothness of the loss and the computational complexity for private SGD with statistically optimal performance. In particular, our results indicate that $α$-Hölder smoothness with $α\ge {1/2}$ is sufficient to guarantee $(ε,δ)$-DP of noisy SGD algorithms while achieving optimal excess risk with the linear gradient complexity $\mathcal{O}(n).$

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.