Paper detail

Differentially Private Distributed Computation via Public-Private Communication Networks

This paper studies the problem of multi-agent computation under the differential privacy requirement of the agents' local datasets against eavesdroppers having node-to-node communications. We first propose for the network equipped with public-private networks. The private network is sparse and not even necessarily connected, over which communications are encrypted and secure along with the intermediate node states; the public network is connected and may be dense, over which communications are allowed to be public. In this setting, we propose a multi-gossip PPSC mechanism over the private network, where at each step, randomly selected node pairs update their states in such a way that they are shuffled with random noise while maintaining summation consistency. We show that this mechanism can achieve any desired differential privacy level with any prescribed probability. Next, we embed this mechanism in distributed computing processes, and propose privacy-guarantee protocols for three basic computation tasks, where an adaptive mechanism adjusts the amount of noise injected in PPSC steps for privacy protection, and the number of regular computation steps for accuracy guarantee. For average consensus, we develop a PPSC-Gossip averaging consensus algorithm by utilizing the multi-gossip PPSC mechanism for privacy encryption before an averaging consensus algorithm over the public network for local computations. For network linear equations and distributed convex optimization, we develop two respective distributed computing protocols by following the PPSC-Gossip averaging consensus algorithm with an additional projection or gradient descent step within each step of computation. Given any privacy and accuracy requirements, it is shown that all three proposed protocols can compute their corresponding problems with the desired computation accuracy, while achieving the desired differential privacy.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.