Paper detail

Differential cross sections for ${{^{12}\mathrm{C}(n,α_{0})}}$, ${{^{16}\mathrm{O}(n,α_{0})}}$ and ${{^{16}\mathrm{O}(n,α_{1,2,3})}}$ between ${E_n}$ = 7.2 and 10 MeV with an active-target Time Projection Chamber

Data for the ${{^{12}\mathrm{C}(n,α_{0})}}$, ${{^{16}\mathrm{O}(n,α_{0})}}$ and ${{^{16}\mathrm{O}(n,α_{1,2,3})}}$ differential cross sections are important for several different areas of nuclear physics such as understanding neutron transmutation in nuclear reactors. The TexAT Time Projection Chamber was used to measure the differential and angle-integrated cross sections in active-target mode. The chamber was filled with CO$_2$ gas and used a quasi-monoenergetic neutron beam from the $d(d,n)$ reaction at Edwards Accelerator Lab at Ohio University. A comparison between our current and previous results at overlapping energies and angles which showed good agreement in angular dependence and absolute cross section. A broader angular coverage than previous results demonstrated that the integrated cross section for the \po16 reaction deviates from ENDFVIII.0 evaluations. This first instance of neutron-induced measurements with an active-target Time Projection Chamber demonstrates the use of this method for high-quality differential cross section data across a broad angular range, generating good statistics with a relatively low-intensity beam.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access27 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.