Paper detail

Differentiable Multiphysics Co-Optimization via Implicit Neural Representations: A Transient Hamburger-Cooking Benchmark

The co-optimization of geometry and physical parameters remains challenging in transient multiphysics systems involving moving boundaries, nonlinear material response, phase transitions, and competing objectives. Existing methods often optimize geometry and physical variables separately, rely on simplified steady-state physics, or require offline data generation and reduced design spaces. Here, we present an end-to-end differentiable co-optimization framework that couples an implicit neural representation of geometry with a JAX-compiled Eulerian multiphysics solver. Geometry is represented as a signed distance field using Fourier-feature-encoded spatial coordinates, while boundary conditions, initial conditions, process controls, and material parameters are optimized within the same differentiable loop. Continuous relaxations represent non-smooth physical transitions while preserving compatibility with reverse-mode automatic differentiation and backpropagation through time. We demonstrate the framework using a transient hamburger-cooking benchmark, selected as an interpretable multiphysics problem rather than a culinary optimization exercise. The benchmark combines conductive and convective heat transfer, latent energy effects, moisture and fat transport, shrinkage-induced geometry evolution, evolving contact boundary conditions, flipping-induced boundary-condition changes, and competing quality objectives. Results show that geometry-only optimization modifies shape to relieve thermal bottlenecks, while joint co-optimization distributes the design response across geometry, material state, process variables, and boundary conditions through gradients propagated over the full transient rollout.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.