Paper detail

Differentiable Linear Bandit Algorithm

Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) is arguably the most commonly used method for linear multi-arm bandit problems. While conceptually and computationally simple, this method highly relies on the confidence bounds, failing to strike the optimal exploration-exploitation if these bounds are not properly set. In the literature, confidence bounds are typically derived from concentration inequalities based on assumptions on the reward distribution, e.g., sub-Gaussianity. The validity of these assumptions however is unknown in practice. In this work, we aim at learning the confidence bound in a data-driven fashion, making it adaptive to the actual problem structure. Specifically, noting that existing UCB-typed algorithms are not differentiable with respect to confidence bound, we first propose a novel differentiable linear bandit algorithm. Then, we introduce a gradient estimator, which allows the confidence bound to be learned via gradient ascent. Theoretically, we show that the proposed algorithm achieves a $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\hatβ\sqrt{dT})$ upper bound of $T$-round regret, where $d$ is the dimension of arm features and $\hatβ$ is the learned size of confidence bound. Empirical results show that $\hatβ$ is significantly smaller than its theoretical upper bound and proposed algorithms outperforms baseline ones on both simulated and real-world datasets.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.