Paper detail

Difference-in-Differences with Time-varying Continuous Treatments using Double/Debiased Machine Learning

We propose a difference-in-differences (DiD) framework designed for time-varying continuous treatments across multiple periods. Specifically, we estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATET) by comparing distinct non-zero treatment intensities. Identification rests on a conditional parallel trends assumption that accounts for observed covariates and past treatment histories. Our approach allows for lagged treatment effects and, in repeated cross-sectional settings, accommodates compositional changes in covariates. We develop kernel-based ATET estimators for both repeated cross-sections and panel data, leveraging the double/debiased machine learning framework to handle potentially high-dimensional covariates and histories. We establish the asymptotic properties of our estimators under mild regularity conditions and demonstrate via simulations that their undersmoothed versions perform well in finite samples. As an empirical illustration, we apply our estimator to assess the effect of the second-dose COVID-19 vaccination rate in Brazil and find that higher vaccination rates reduce COVID-19-related mortality after a lag of several weeks.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.