Paper detail

Difference between thermo- and pyroelectric Co- based RE-(= Nd, Y, Gd, Ce)-oxide composites measured by high-temperature gradient

Seebeck-Voltage measurements of Cobalt-based oxide-composites containing rare-earth elements (RE= Nd, Y, Gd, Ce) were performed under high temperature gradients up to 700 K. Several dependences were measured, Seebeeck voltage as a function of time U_S(t)or temperature difference U_S(Delta_T), closed circuited electric current as a function of Seebeck voltage I_S(U_S), or time I_S(t). While Nd2O3+CoO and Y2O3+CoO show linear n-type US(t)-behavior as usual thermoelectrics, Gd2O3+CoO possesses a large hysteresis. At both, Gd2O3- and Ce2O3+CoO also large time dependence I(t) referred to as pyroelectric material with high capacity were detected. Both anomalies became smaller when Fe2O3 is added or appear in Nd2O3+CoO and Y2O3+CoO when Al2O3 is added and can be explained by electron sucking into interfacial space charge regions, a new materials science challenge.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.