Paper detail

Dictionary Learning with Few Samples and Matrix Concentration

Let $A$ be an $n \times n$ matrix, $X$ be an $n \times p$ matrix and $Y = AX$. A challenging and important problem in data analysis, motivated by dictionary learning and other practical problems, is to recover both $A$ and $X$, given $Y$. Under normal circumstances, it is clear that this problem is underdetermined. However, in the case when $X$ is sparse and random, Spielman, Wang and Wright showed that one can recover both $A$ and $X$ efficiently from $Y$ with high probability, given that $p$ (the number of samples) is sufficiently large. Their method works for $p \ge C n^2 \log^ 2 n$ and they conjectured that $p \ge C n \log n$ suffices. The bound $n \log n$ is sharp for an obvious information theoretical reason. In this paper, we show that $p \ge C n \log^4 n$ suffices, matching the conjectural bound up to a polylogarithmic factor. The core of our proof is a theorem concerning $l_1$ concentration of random matrices, which is of independent interest. Our proof of the concentration result is based on two ideas. The first is an economical way to apply the union bound. The second is a refined version of Bernstein's concentration inequality for the sum of independent variables. Both have nothing to do with random matrices and are applicable in general settings.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.