Paper detail

Developments in non-relativistic field theory and complexity

This thesis focuses on two research areas: non-relativistic field theories and complexity. In the first part we review the general classification of the trace anomaly for 2+1 dimensional field theories coupled to a Newton-Cartan background and we apply the heat kernel method to compute the trace anomaly for specific theories. We find a relation with the conformal anomaly of the 3+1 dimensional relativistic counterpart which suggests the existence of a non-relativistic version of the a-theorem. We consider a model realizing a $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetric extension of the Bargmann group in 2+1 dimensions with non-vanishing superpotential, obtained by null reduction of a relativistic Wess-Zumino model. We check that the superpotential is protected against quantum corrections as in the relativistic parent theory, thus finding a non-relativistic version of the non-renormalization theorem. We find evidence that the theory is one-loop exact, due to the causal structure of the non-relativistic propagator together with mass conservation. In the second part of the thesis we review the holographic conjectures proposed by Susskind to describe the time-evolution of the Einstein-Rosen bridge in gravity: the complexity=volume and complexity=action. We investigate both the volume and the action for black holes living in warped $\mathrm{AdS}_3$ spacetime. There exist extensions of the proposals when the dual state from the field theory side is mixed; we then analytically compute the subregion action complexity for a general segment on the boundary in the BTZ black hole background, finding that it is equal to the sum of a linearly divergent term proportional to the size of the subregion and of a term proportional to the entanglement entropy. We also find that mutual holographic complexity carries a different content compared to mutual information. This means that entropy is not enough!

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.