Paper detail

Development of a relaxation calorimeter for temperatures between 0.05 and 4 K

A detailed description of an isoperibol calorimeter for temperatures between 0.05 and 4 K is presented. The proposed setup can provide absolute values of the heat capacity $C$ of small samples (typically 1 mg). The extremely simple design of the sample platform, based on a sapphire substrate, and the experimental setup, which makes use only of a lock-in amplifier and a temperature controller, make the construction of such a calorimeter easy and inexpensive. The thermal-relaxation method is employed, which utilizes a permanent thermal link $k$ between the sample platform and the low-temperature bath. The temperature dependence of $k(T)$ is shown for several platforms throughout the entire temperature range: $k(T)/T$ is nearly constant down to 1 K, where it starts to decrease smoothly. The observed behavior is thoroughly explained by considering the thermal resistances of the platform constituents. A comparison between the values of $k(T)/T$ for platforms based on sapphire and on silver is presented where no significant difference has been observed. Each platform can be assembled to have a particular value of $k/T$ at 1 K. Since the sample relaxation time $τ\sim C/k$, $k(T)$ can be adjusted to $C(T)$ to give a reasonably fast measuring time: Here, it is demonstrated how this calorimeter can be used in so-called single-shot refrigerators ($^{3}$He or demagnetization cryostats), where the time for a single measurement is limited. In addition, it can be used in moderate magnetic fields $B \leq 10$ T, because the platform constituents are weakly field dependent.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.