Paper detail

Deterministic and Energy-Optimal Wireless Synchronization

We consider the problem of clock synchronization in a wireless setting where processors must power-down their radios in order to save energy. Energy efficiency is a central goal in wireless networks, especially if energy resources are severely limited. In the current setting, the problem is to synchronize clocks of $m$ processors that wake up in arbitrary time points, such that the maximum difference between wake up times is bounded by a positive integer $n$, where time intervals are appropriately discretized. Currently, the best-known results for synchronization for single-hop networks of $m$ processors is a randomized algorithm due to \cite{BKO09} of O(\sqrt {n /m} \cdot poly-log(n)) awake times per processor and a lower bound of Omega(\sqrt{n/m}) of the number of awake times needed per processor \cite{BKO09}. The main open question left in their work is to close the poly-log gap between the upper and the lower bound and to de-randomize their probabilistic construction and eliminate error probability. This is exactly what we do in this paper. That is, we show a {deterministic} algorithm with radio use of Theta(\sqrt {n /m}) that never fails. We stress that our upper bound exactly matches the lower bound proven in \cite{BKO09}, up to a small multiplicative constant. Therefore, our algorithm is {optimal} in terms of energy efficiency and completely resolves a long sequence of works in this area. In order to achieve these results we devise a novel {adaptive} technique that determines the times when devices power their radios on and off. In addition, we prove several lower bounds on the energy efficiency of algorithms for {multi-hop networks}. Specifically, we show that any algorithm for multi-hop networks must have radio use of Omega(\sqrt n) per processor.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.