Paper detail

Deterministic Algorithms for the Hidden Subgroup Problem

We present deterministic algorithms for the Hidden Subgroup Problem. The first algorithm, for abelian groups, achieves the same asymptotic worst-case query complexity as the optimal randomized algorithm, namely O($\sqrt{ n}\,$), where $n$ is the order of the group. The analogous algorithm for non-abelian groups comes within a $\sqrt{ \log n}$ factor of the optimal randomized query complexity. The best known randomized algorithm for the Hidden Subgroup Problem has expected query complexity that is sensitive to the input, namely O($\sqrt{ n/m}\,$), where $m$ is the order of the hidden subgroup. In the first version of this article (arXiv:2104.14436v1 [cs.DS]), we asked if there is a deterministic algorithm whose query complexity has a similar dependence on the order of the hidden subgroup. Prompted by this question, Ye and Li (arXiv:2110.00827v1 [cs.DS]) present deterministic algorithms for abelian groups which solve the problem with O($\sqrt{ n/m }\,$ ) queries, and find the hidden subgroup with O($\sqrt{ n (\log m) / m} + \log m$) queries. Moreover, they exhibit instances which show that in general, the deterministic query complexity of the problem may be o($\sqrt{ n/m } \,$), and that of finding the entire subgroup may also be o($\sqrt{ n/m } \,$) or even $ω(\sqrt{ n/m } \,)$. We present a different deterministic algorithm for the Hidden Subgroup Problem that also has query complexity O($\sqrt{ n/m }\,$) for abelian groups. The algorithm is arguably simpler. Moreover, it works for non-abelian groups, and has query complexity O($\sqrt{ (n/m) \log (n/m) }\,$) for a large class of instances, such as those over supersolvable groups. We build on this to design deterministic algorithms to find the hidden subgroup for all abelian and some non-abelian instances, at the cost of a $\log m$ multiplicative factor increase in the query complexity.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.