Paper detail

Determination of magic wavelengths for the $7s ~ {^2}S_{1/2}-7p ~ {^2}P_{3/2,1/2}$ transitions in Fr atom

Magic wavelengthsfor the $7S_{1/2}-7P_{1/2,3/2}$ transitions in Fr were reported by Dammalapati \textit{et al.} in [Phys. Rev. A 93, 043407 (2016)]. These $λ_{\rm{magic}}$ were determined by plotting dynamic polarizabilities ($α$) of the involved states with the above transitions against a desired range of wavelength. Electric dipole (E1) matrix elements listed in [J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 36, 497 (2007)], from the measured lifetimes of the $7P_{1/2,3/2}$ states and from the calculations considering core-polarization effects in the relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method, were used to determine $α$. However, contributions from core correlation effects and from the E1 matrix elements of the $7P-7S$, $7P-8S$ and $7P-6D$ transitions to $α$ of the $7P$ states were ignored. In this work, we demonstrate importance of these contributions and improve accuracies of $α$ further by replacing the E1 matrix elements taken from the HFR method by the values obtained employing relativistic coupled-cluster theory. Our static $α$ are found to be in excellent agreement with the other available theoretical results; whereas substituting the E1 matrix elements used by Dammalapati \textit{et al.} give very small $α$ values for the $7P$ states. Owing to this, we find disagreement in $λ_{\rm{magic}}$ reported by Dammalapati \textit{et al.} for linearly polarized light; especially at wavelengths close to the D-lines and in the infrared region. As a consequence, a $λ_{\rm{magic}}$ reported at 797.75 nm which was seen supporting a blue detuned trap in their work is now estimated at 771.03 nm and is supporting a red detuned trap. Also, none of our results match with the earlier results for circularly polarized light. Moreover, our static values of $α$ will be very useful for guiding experiments to carry out their measurements.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.