Paper detail

Detection thresholds in very sparse matrix completion

Let $A$ be a rectangular matrix of size $m\times n$ and $A_1$ be the random matrix where each entry of $A$ is multiplied by an independent $\{0,1\}$-Bernoulli random variable with parameter $1/2$. This paper is about when, how and why the non-Hermitian eigen-spectra of the randomly induced asymmetric matrices $A_1 (A - A_1)^*$ and $(A-A_1)^*A_1$ captures more of the relevant information about the principal component structure of $A$ than via its SVD or the eigen-spectra of $A A^*$ and $A^* A$, respectively. Hint: the asymmetry inducing randomness breaks the echo-chamber effect that cripples the SVD. We illustrate the application of this striking phenomenon on the low-rank matrix completion problem for the setting where each entry is observed with probability $d/n$, including the very sparse regime where $d$ is of order $1$, where matrix completion via the SVD of $A$ fails or produces unreliable recovery. We determine an asymptotically exact, matrix-dependent, non-universal detection threshold above which reliable, statistically optimal matrix recovery using a new, universal data-driven matrix-completion algorithm is possible. Averaging the left and right eigenvectors provably improves the recovered matrix but not the detection threshold. We define another variant of this asymmetric procedure that bypasses the randomization step and has a detection threshold that is smaller by a constant factor but with a computational cost that is larger by a polynomial factor of the number of observed entries. Both detection thresholds shatter the seeming barrier due to the well-known information theoretical limit $d \asymp \log n$ for matrix completion found in the literature.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.