Paper detail

Detection of the number of principal components by extended AIC-type method

Estimating the number of principal components is one of the fundamental problems in many scientific fields such as signal processing (or the spiked covariance model). In this paper, we first demonstrate that, for fixed $p$, any penalty term of the form $k'(p-k'/2+1/2)C_n$ may lead to an asymptotically consistent estimator under the condition that $C_n\to\infty$ and $C_n/n\to0$. We also extend our results to the case $n,p\to\infty$, with $p/n\to c>0$. In this case, for $k=o(n^{\frac{1}{3}})$, we first investigate the limiting laws for the leading eigenvalues of the sample covariance matrix $S_n$ under the condition that $λ_k>1+\sqrt{c}$. At low SNR, since the AIC tends to underestimate the number of signals $k$, the AIC should be re-defined in this case. As a natural extension of the AIC for fixed $p$, we propose the extended AIC (EAIC), i.e., the AIC-type method with tuning parameter $γ=φ(c)=1/2+\sqrt{1/c}-\log(1+\sqrt{c})/c$, and demonstrate that the EAIC-type method, i.e., the AIC-type method with tuning parameter $γ>φ(c)$, can select the number of signals $k$ consistently. In the following two cases, (1) $p$ fixed, $n\to\infty$, (2) $n,p\to\infty$ with $p/n\to 0$, if the AIC is defined as the degeneration of the EAIC in the case $n,p\to\infty$ with $p/n\to c>0$, i.e., $γ=\lim_{c\rightarrow 0+0}φ(c)=1$, then we have essentially demonstrated that, to achieve the consistency of the AIC-type method in the above two cases, $γ>1$ is required. Moreover, we show that the EAIC-type method is essentially tuning-free and outperforms the well-known KN estimator proposed in Kritchman and Nadler (2008) and the BCF estimator proposed in Bai, Choi and Fujikoshi (2018). Numerical studies indicate that the proposed method works well.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.