Paper detail

Detection of Sparse Positive Dependence

In a bivariate setting, we consider the problem of detecting a sparse contamination or mixture component, where the effect manifests itself as a positive dependence between the variables, which are otherwise independent in the main component. We first look at this problem in the context of a normal mixture model. In essence, the situation reduces to a univariate setting where the effect is a decrease in variance. In particular, a higher criticism test based on the pairwise differences is shown to achieve the detection boundary defined by the (oracle) likelihood ratio test. We then turn to a Gaussian copula model where the marginal distributions are unknown. Standard invariance considerations lead us to consider rank tests. In fact, a higher criticism test based on the pairwise rank differences achieves the detection boundary in the normal mixture model, although not in the very sparse regime. We do not know of any rank test that has any power in that regime.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.