Paper detail

Detecting multiple change-points in general causal time series using penalized quasi-likelihood

This paper is devoted to the off-line multiple change-point detection in a semiparametric framework. The time series is supposed to belong to a large class of models including AR($\infty$), ARCH($\infty$), TARCH($\infty$),... models where the coefficients change at each instant of breaks. The different unknown parameters (number of changes, change dates and parameters of successive models) are estimated using a penalized contrast built on conditional quasi-likelihood. Under Lipshitzian conditions on the model, the consistency of the estimator is proved when the moment order $r$ of the process satisfies $r\geq 2$. If $r\geq 4$, the same convergence rates for the estimators than in the case of independent random variables are obtained. The particular cases of AR($\infty$), ARCH($\infty$) and TARCH($\infty$) show that our method notably improves the existing results.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.