Paper detail

Detecting Imprinting and Maternal Effects Using Monte Carlo Expectation Maximization Algorithm

Numerous statistical methods have been developed to explore genomic imprinting and maternal effects, which are causes of parent-of-origin patterns in complex human diseases. However, most of them either only model one of these two confounded epigenetic effects, or make strong yet unrealistic assumptions about the population to avoid over-parameterization. A recent partial likelihood method (LIME) can identify both epigenetic effects based on case-control family data without those assumptions. Theoretical and empirical studies have shown its validity and robustness. However, because LIME obtains parameter estimation by maximizing partial likelihood, it is interesting to compare its efficiency with full likelihood maximizer. To overcome the difficulty in over-parameterization when using full likelihood, in this study we propose a Monte Carlo Expectation Maximization (MCEM) method to detect imprinting and maternal effects jointly. Those unknown mating type probabilities, the nuisance parameters, can be considered as latent variables in EM algorithm. Monte Carlo samples are used to numerically approximate the expectation function that cannot be solved algebraically. Our simulation results show that though this MCEM algorithm takes longer computational time, and can give higher bias in some simulations compared to LIME, it can generally detect both epigenetic effects with higher power and smaller standard error which demonstrates that it can be a good complement of LIME method.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.