Paper detail

Detecting Anomalous Activity on Networks with the Graph Fourier Scan Statistic

We consider the problem of deciding, based on a single noisy measurement at each vertex of a given graph, whether the underlying unknown signal is constant over the graph or there exists a cluster of vertices with anomalous activation. This problem is relevant to several applications such as surveillance, disease outbreak detection, biomedical imaging, environmental monitoring, etc. Since the activations in these problems often tend to be localized to small groups of vertices in the graphs, we model such activity by a class of signals that are supported over a (possibly disconnected) cluster with low cut size relative to its size. We analyze the corresponding generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) statistics and relate it to the problem of finding a sparsest cut in the graph. We develop a tractable relaxation of the GLR statistic based on the combinatorial Laplacian of the graph, which we call the graph Fourier scan statistic, and analyze its properties. We show how its performance as a testing procedure depends directly on the spectrum of the graph, and use this result to explicitly derive its asymptotic properties on a few significant graph topologies. Finally, we demonstrate theoretically and with simulations that the graph Fourier scan statistic can outperform naive testing procedures based on global averaging and vertex-wise thresholding. We also demonstrate the usefulness of the GFSS by analyzing groundwater Arsenic concentrations from a U.S. Geological Survey dataset.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.